Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:49
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
macOS Tahoe Name Leaked Ahead of Apple's WWDC Event Next Week - MacRumors
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Vienna calling: Strauss's 'Blue Danube' waltzes into outer space - Phys.org
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump's U.S. Steel decision may come later than expected - Axios
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
He said he loves me, but why is it difficult for him to leave his wife?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
S&P Dow Jones Makes No Changes to S&P 500 in Quarterly Rebalance - Bloomberg
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why do creationists ask for proof of evolution and then ignore the answers?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why do I sweat a great deal while exercising the same on some days and not so much on others?